CIA-The World Factbook Essay

As a member of the Arab League, an organization, of Arab States founded in 1945, Syria joined the Arab States in the War against Israel in 1948 and since then the two countries squander been at war. Despite the down of the Arab army in 1948, there was another Arab- Israeli war, June of 1967. Heavy fighting took place between Syria and Israel. A truce was arranged within a few days, exclusively not before Israel had occupied hundreds of true miles of territory in southwestern Syria. Incidentally, before acceding to the United Nations cease-fire, the Israeli forces took over control of the fortified Golan high gear commanding the Sea of Galilee.The strategic, heavily fortified plateau that is the Golan Heights is wary of war. The announcement of the union of the cranial orbit into Israel in December 1981 added to Syrias territorial losses. Syria has not accepted detachment of the Golan Heights from the Syrian motherland. As of October 1991, both Syria and Israel have engaged in o n -and-off discussions of making peace. The countries have considered enquire the U. S. to oversee an accord, which would agnise it more likely that American peace monitors would be put in place on the Heights.Israel has concur to withdraw from the Golan, with the implicit under tie-uping that the withdrawal will be total. The two sides have accepted the reign overr of equality of equality of security arrangements on and around the Golan. Both countries, for instance, would remove their armed forces from the border region. However, the Syrians demanded that the demilitarization be symmetrical Israel insisted that it could not pull back as far as Syria, since the Syrians having possession of the Heights would have had enormous topological advantage in the event of a surprise attack. there is an agreement that the Israeli withdrawal would take place gradually. Syria wants it completed in something close to 1 and a half years ,while Israel is asking for three. For the Syrians, t he Golan is just a channel of saving grace, since Syria in its history of participation in the Arab- Israeli Wars, it has befuddled a lot of its territorial land. As of 1997 there have been no major breakthroughs. The Palestine vainglorious Organization (PLO) as the name, implies is an independent soil of Israel.Again this is about Syrias membership in the Arab League. There have been repeated failures in tackling the Palestine question. With the emergence of the Palestine guerilla movement, and the PLO-Israeli attacks, Palestine is a continuous reminder that inter-Arab unity should be achieved as soon as possible. Because of the PLO situation, the loss of Palestine and the continuing tragedy of the Palestinian people, there is disillusionment and political alienation in Arab country.Large Palestinian refugee groups have create a an opulent and critical significance in Lebanon and Jordan. The precise large Palestinian refugee conglomerate in Syria has been assured of Syrian kindness for their cause. Although it is obvious that Syrias compassion is politically rooted. The stark political sympathy that the Syrian government has for the independent state of Israel which is the PLO has a significant influence on the inception of a specific question that this paper asks.How does Syria use terrorism in formulating the countrys foreign and defensive structure mechanism policy as it places particular emphasis on its relationship with Israel? This paper uses terrorism as the abject welding channel to unify this study, not only due to the fact that terrorism is a very timely and relevant global political issue but besides because terrorism is not a very unlikely dodge (any longer) when it comes to most strategies of defense which belong to Arab nation states.Schmuel Bahr, in his study Bashars Syria The Regime and its Strategic Worldview which appeargond in the book Comparative Strategy, begins his research with how, The Syrian regimeand to a certain extent modern Syria in a broader senseis the handwork of Hafez al-Asad. (353). Bahr also states that, His thirty-year autocratic rule (before which he also had wielded considerable influence in the regime of his predecessor) has made distinguishing between the president and the state almost impossible. (353).Eyal Zisser, on the other hand, writes in the journal article Whos Afraid of Syrian nationalism? National and State Identity in Syria, Bashshars commitment to Arabism required no substantiation. He frequently stressed his loyalty to the Arab nation in public statements and depicted Syria as a fortress of Arabism. (179). Zisser also reveals the following about the confidence the Syria has on itself as an independent country, This state is no longer fragile, but rather is self-confident. (196).An article (c.2007) devoted to the state of Syria, governmental Overview , an article that was part of The Syria Review 2007 presents that, The U. S. government has designate Syria a sta te-sponsor of terrorism. (67). With regard to Syrias defense history of utilizing terrorism as a political strategy Zisser writes, The Syrian government has taken a generally aggressive stance against insurgent organizations that oppose its rule. Its efforts to inhibit insurrection have generally been successful. Militants did manage to bomb a bus in Damascus in 1997, killing 20. (68).The 2007 CIA-The World FactbookSyria informs that the current government type of this nation is that of, republic under an authoritarian, military-dominated regime. (series 02771527). Erik Knudsen in his The Syrian-Israeli Political Impasse A Study in Conflict, War and Mistrust. , which had been part of the journal Diplomacy and Statecraft discusses the stand of Syria when it comes to its situation with Israel as far as the topic of peace goeswith, Furthermore, the Israeli governments point out that Syria has displayed a reluctance to pursue a real and lasting peace. (213).Finally, however, the re appears to be known data which seemingly communicates a message which is quite supportive of Syrias foreign policy when it comes to military and governmental defense in Noriko Satos On the Horns of the Terrorist Dilemma Christian Syrians Response To Israeli Terrorism in the academician journal History and Anthropology and this known data contains this, As related earlier, it is a prevailing understanding among Aleppienes (coming from Alepo, to hold still for Syrian Christians) that terrorism is a byproduct of United States policy and that the Israeli military operations against the Palestinians are conducted in the guise of supporting American policy for combating terrorism. (152).