Short answer Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Short answer - Essay instanceNow the kind of relish that explains the relationship between man and woman, those are a couple of sexual partners, can be defined as a category in itself. However, referring to Aristotles works, Solomon might produce tried to define love in a broader context. Consequently, he selected to reflect on human bearing (and particularly his/her statements) during sex. And Solomon does not hesitate to consider love from both homosexual and heterosexual perspectives. This turns a executable classification scheme rather blur because homosexual relationships cannot lead to child birth and be alter within the traditional concept of family. So, Solomons theory gives rise to a possible categorization scheme, where love is to be redefined as per the different situations that come up in the course of making love. And this love-making can be mediocre hugging and kissing. It can also be a much intensive activity wish well sexual intercourse. Or it can be just li ke sharing words of affection or staring at each other in fascination. In sum, categorizing love on the basis socio-sexual appearance becomes so much multidimensional so that no categorization remains achievable at all. And a single category of romantic love appears to be most difficult to shape. Finally, Solomon expresses his lack of confidence on todays definition of romantic love. ... (Symposium, 207A) Diotima has been a controversial figure in the history of philosophy. at that place are opinions that Diotima is nothing but a character created by Plato himself. On the other hand, historical look into reveals that Plato talked about the prophecies of real characters so Diotima might have been a real philosopher of ancient Greece. Whatever was the case, Diotimas definition and perspective on human love can be better understood as a Platonic concept since most of her ideas have been conveyed and/or analyzed by Plato only. Diotima was a female person philosopher, so her analysis is important from the perspective of studying gender relations too. Hence the term Platonic love can be attributed to Diotima in a wider way. Apparently, Platonic love is an acceptance of the power of spectator and it might be related to sex activity too, because beauty is largely about physical attractiveness of a person. However, Diotimas treatment of the topic was not as much linear as a sexuality and physical beauty related affair. In fact, she tried to correlate love with the beauty of mind. For Diotima, begetting something cannot be just a physical achievement as must be explained in terms of touch, visibility, etc. Diotima range more emphasis on the realization of beauty by human mind that culminate at divinity. So originating from Diotimas fundamental prophecies, Platonic love accomplishes at the essence of asexual love, where beauty and instauration are still at the prime focus. So sexuality can also be introduced in this realm, but not from the viewpoint of fulfilling sexual desire. Sex and beauty, from the view of Platonic love can be more purposive as for to have children or build relationship. Finally, Diotimas approach appears to be more holistic and